Pitfalls in Redemptive-Historical Preaching and Suggested Remedies

What is the message of the Bible? As you answer this question, here are some pitfalls to avoid and remedy so that you may preach the full counsel of God. More »

Download Lecrae’s New CD for Free

Lecrae's New CD Church Clothes is out, and you can download it for free! More »

Reformed Cast Interview about The Harry Potter Bible Study

Scott Oakland recently interviewed me about my book The Harry Potter Bible Study. More »

Adolf Hitler’s Thoughts About Romney coming to Liberty University

I thought this was funny. More »

My Thoughts on Mitt Romney Speaking at Liberty University’s Spring 2012 Graduation

Should Liberty invite Mormons to speak at their graduation(s)? I try to answer this question using Liberty's own words. More »

Ten Contemporary Sacred Cows that Need to be Tipped

It's time for some cow tipping! More »

Three Youtube Videos we use in Family Worship

Share My wife and I have two children; one is four years of age and the other is about to turn three. Here are three videos from youtube that we use during More »

What’s Wrong With the Church?

Some issues that need to be answered by local churches. More »

Daily Archives: December 13, 2011

Calling Out Peter Lumpkins and His Supporters

Peter Lumpkins recently wrote an article titled “The International Mission Board and Uninspired Missions Giving.”  In this article, he laments that J.D. Greear and David Platt are the chosen spokesmen for the IMB Lottie Moon Christmas Offering promotional DVD.  Here are the reasons he disagrees with Greear and Platt being the spokesmen:

1. Greear’s church (The Summit Church) doesn’t include anything about the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering on its website or in its half-finished Annual Church Profile report, which according to Lumpkins, only includes their number of baptisms.

2. Platt’s church (The Church at Brook Hills) hasn’t filled out an Annual Church Profile Report since 2007.

3. As best Peter can tell, Platt’s church gave to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering in 1996, and hasn’t given to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering since.

The saddest thing about Peter’s article is that instead of actually finding out from these churches if they give to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering or instead of hearing about their giving from the IMB, Peter assumes the worst, that neither Greear’s or Platt’s churches support the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering.  Here’s some quotes from his article,

According to the church’s website, Greear’s church sponsors a yearly “Christmas Missions Offering,” the goal of which is 625K for 2011. A full 75% ($468,750) will go toward “Church Planting” and the remaining 25% ($156,250) will be used for “Local Outreach.” One will look in vain for any specific reference that monies raised will be given to The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering. But if Greear’s church does not participate in cooperative giving toward raising the $175,000,000 the International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention is pursuing, why is J.D. Greear a spokesman for the offering? Why would IMB allow him to be a catylst for inspiring others to give to a cause toward which Greear apparently has no loyalties? Let me be clear: I am not suggesting Dr. Greear lacks loyalities to global missions, church planting, and/or world evangelism.

To the contrary, when one looks at the many global projects in which The Summit Church is involved, one cannot go away concluding no interest exists inchurch planting. On the other hand, the question is not about whether passion forchurch planting exists but whether a passion for cooperative missions is present. In Greear’s case, then, him being chosen to be a poster boy for the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering remains entirely inexplicable.

Even so, the inexplicability of Greear’s presence as a promotional tool for the IMB is to be surpassed by David Platt’s presence on the video. Why? Since 2007, The Church at Brook Hills has apparently not filed an ACP report which means we do not know if the church either supports the cooperative program in any significant way or presently supports The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for international missions. And, if their record of past giving to Lottie Moon predicts present support, it is not unreasonable to assume that they are not now giving to international missions through The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering. As best I can tell, the last gift to Lottie Moon given by the Church at Brook Hills was 1996. They recorded $3,333 to the Christmas offering, a sum taken from total receipts of $3.7m. The same year, they posted $198,000 toward “non-SBC Mission Expenditures.” Hence, if David Platt serves as another inspirational catalyst for giving to The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering, one must wonder just how out of touch the International Mission Board is with grassroots Southern Baptists.

Yet, not only is Platt in the promotional DVD, IMB has also tapped into Platt as a keynote speaker for international missions.The International Missions Board is sponsoring a conference entitled “Missions Forum 2012 East” to be held February 20 – 22, 2012 at the First Baptist Church Trussville, AL. Along with IMB vice-president, Gordon Fort, David Platt is scheduled as a featured speaker. Once again, we have men lifted up as role models in areas where there is no apparent evidence they qualify for the job. Since no evidence appears to exist in reasonably accepted sources (i.e. ACP data) that Platt supports Southern Baptist cooperative missions, then the IMB seems obligated to explain to Southern Baptists why it publicizes and promotes him as a spokesman for Southern Baptist missionary causes.

Does anyone see the problem with Lumpkins’s assumptions?  He has no proof that Greear’s or Platt’s churches do not give to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering, and yet, he assumes the worst.  Just a quick google of Greear’s church, and one finds that The Summit church gave $192,400 to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering in 2010.  Thus, Lumpkins’s negative assumption about Greear is dead wrong.

Not only does Peter assume the worst, but his supporters assume the worst as well.  Listen to this comment by Ron Hale:

Peter,
We are living in a day, when it is very easy for Missions Leaders at IMB and NAMB to retrieve information on the top ten givers in various sizes of congregations … to the Lottie Moon Offering for International Missions and Annie Armstrong Offering for North American Missions.

It seems only sensible and wise that we would use those who are currently setting the greatest examples of sacrifice as visible and vocal examples in giving to SBC causes.

In a local church setting, we would never use a member for a tithing testimony if they gave poorly to the local church but gave generously to other local charities.

You are wise for not calling into question their commitment to church planting and outreach around the world, but you are also courageous for calling into question their support (or lack thereof) to the Southern Baptist cause of the Lottie Moon Offering for International Missions. Through this proven method, our 5,000 plus missionaries will be blessed.

Although this story greatly saddens me, I must thank you for reporting on this issue!

Courageous?  Really Ron?  It’s courageous to speculate about fellow brothers in Christ, to assume the worst based on zero evidence?  It blows my mind that Lumpkins’s supporters cannot see that his article is based on negative assumptions, speculation, and poor research.  There’s no basis for his negative assumptions other than his own bias.  He has no data to base his assumptions on.  The closest data he has is that the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering is not mentioned on the Summit Church’s website and the Church at Brook Hills didn’t give to Lottie Moon in 2007, so he assumes that they do not give today either.  It’s entirely speculation.

This is just another example of many examples where Lumpkins finds smoke where there’s no fire.

So, my challenge to Lumpkins and his supporters is this: If it’s proven that Greear’s church (already proven) and Platt’s church give to the Lottie Moon Christmas offering, will you publicly recant your statements against these men and the IMB?  Will you also repent for sowing discord among your Southern Baptist brethren?  

Do you think your negative statements about these men and the IMB encourage churches to give to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering?  How many Southern Baptists, like Ron Hale, actually believe your statements and your articles without researching for themselves?

Peter, if you’re such a huge supporter of the SBC, why are you throwing a negative light on the IMB during the month of its major offering?  You’re not helping the SBC with your various conspiracy theories.  To Peter’s supporters, you’re not helping the SBC either by encouraging him to assume the worst about his SBC brethren and SBC entities.

What are your thoughts?

Incoming search terms for the article:

Participating in Media is an Act of Worship

Share

(This article is an excerpt from The Harry Potter Bible Study: Enjoying God Through the Final Four Harry Potter Movies)

Besides the theologians we have in Scripture, there has not been another theologian as influential in the church as early church father Bishop Augustine of Hippo. Although he wrote extensively, his most important writings were against the Pelagians. This group was named after their main leader Pelagius. He was a British monk known for his piety and strict discipline and was later condemned as a heretic.[i]

Augustine taught all humans born since the Fall possessed sinful natures (original sin) from birth (Gen. 3).[ii] Pelagius, on the other hand, believed all humans were born as innocent beings who later developed a sinful nature by freely choosing sin from the example of other sinful human beings.[iii] In other words, Augustine believed the world is evil because humans are evil, while Pelagius believed humans are evil because the world is evil.

Often in ministry I have observed evangelicals who claim to believe all humans are born sinners (Augustine), and yet live as if their children will be corrupted by outside influences (Pelagius). Parents may profess their children are sinners, but they seek to protect them from a sinful world as if the world is the problem. The problem with our children is not outside influences but is instead their inside influences (Matt. 15:10-11, 17-20). If you and I merely protect our children from external sinful influences, which is impossible in an evil world, we will not address the source of their sin: themselves. Our children are what is wrong with the world; the world is not what is wrong with our children.

Instead of living as if our children “will be” corrupted by the world, we should teach them to handle their own sinful natures in a wicked world. In order to communicate this reality, we must tell our children they are what is wrong with the world. We must teach them they are sinners (Rom. 3:23) in desperate need of a Savior (John 14:6). Apart from His life, death, burial, and resurrection in their stead, there is no hope for them (Rom. 6:23). Christ’s finished work is their only hope for being reconciled to God the Father (Rom. 10:9-11; Col. 1:19-22).

By the time our children are 18 years of age, they should be prepared to live in a wicked world in which they are part of the wickedness. Though some may be saved, they must be prepared to face temptation since they still live in an evil world. We must thoroughly teach them the Scriptures and how to recognize the difference between truth and lies in their surrounding culture. If we believe the world is the problem, we will try to shield them from the world; however, if we believe they are the problem, we will instead teach them how to hide the Word of God in their hearts so they might not sin against God (Ps. 119:11).

Because we cannot separate our children from their sinful natures (Augustine), we must prepare them to handle their sinful natures. We must cultivate the fruit of the Spirit in our children, realizing they will always desire wickedness on earth; yet, they must learn to appropriate and cultivate the self-control of God the Holy Spirit, His fruit in their lives (Gal. 5:22-25). One of the biggest problems of children raised by evangelical Christians is they are not prepared to live in this world. Unfortunately, Augustinian parents are practicing the methodology of Pelagians. Our children do not know how to handle temptation whenever they cannot escape it because we have falsely deified our ability to protect our children, thus hindering the cultivation of personal self-control in their lives.

In other words, while trying to protect our children through legalistic boundaries, we have not prepared them to live in this wicked world. Yet temptation will knock on the door unannounced and uninvited (at times welcomed with open arms), and no amount of legalistic boundaries can stop it. If we have not taught our children how to respond to temptation by teaching them how to discern, we doom them for eventual failure.

One way to help our children cultivate discernment in this wicked world is to engage in the media wars with them as a guide. Just as Paul told the Corinthians, “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ” (1 Cor. 11:1), we too must say to all of our observers, “Be imitators of my media participation, as I am of Christ.” Allow me to clarify my suggestion to purposely put ungodly behavior in front of your children. I’m not suggesting you expose children to immorality so that they will know what is immoral. We do not want to tempt our children to sin. Rather, I am suggesting parents thoroughly teach children the Scriptures, and then teach them the difference between truth and lies in pop culture, in light of the Scriptures.

All forms of media, regardless of their rating, intended audience, genre, etc., contain truth and lies woven together into an ungodly web. We must teach our children how to untangle this web. One way to teach our children how to separate truth from lies is to show them how to use discernment as they participate in media. In our media-driven world, our children will participate in media, and they will either participate like Christians or like non-Christians. Unfortunately, many evangelical Christians participate in media like non-Christians, simply drinking deeply of all they see and hear without separating truth from lies.

The purpose of media participation is worship. In order to enjoy God through media, Christians must submit to God’s revealed Word in light of Christ’s finished work and take every thought captive to obey Christ (2 Cor. 10:5). In other words, Christians must be on their knees in their cultures worshiping God through recognizing His fingerprints in the media produced by God’s fallen image-bearers. In the words of Augustine, Christians must plunder the Egyptians:

For, as the Egyptians had not only the idols and heavy burdens which the people of Israel hated and fled from, but also vessels and ornaments of gold and silver, and garments, which the same people when going out of Egypt appropriated to themselves, designing them for a better use, not doing this on their own authority, but by the command of God, the Egyptians themselves, in their ignorance, providing them with things which they themselves, were not making a good use of [Exod. 3:21-22; Exod. 12:35-36]; in the same way all branches of heathen learning have not only false and superstitious fancies and heavy burdens of unnecessary toil, which every one of us, when going out under the leadership of Christ from the fellowship of the heathen, ought to abhor and avoid; but they contain also liberal instruction which is better adapted to the use of the truth, and some most excellent precepts of morality; and some truths in regard even to the worship of the One God are found among them. Now these are, so to speak, their gold and silver, which they did not create themselves, but dug out of the mines of God’s providence which are everywhere scattered abroad, and are perversely and unlawfully prostituting to the worship of devils. These, therefore, the Christian, when he separates himself in spirit from the miserable fellowship of these men, ought to take away from them, and to devote to their proper use in preaching the gospel. Their garments, also,—that is, human institutions such as are adapted to that intercourse with men which is indispensable in this life,—we must take and turn to a Christian use.[iv]

Evangelical Christians must train themselves and their children to plunder pagan media for the “gold” and “silver” and put them to Christian use.



[i] Justo L. González, The Story of Christianity: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1984), 214.

[ii] Ibid., 214-215.

[iii] Ibid., 215.

[iv] Marcus Dods, ed., The Works of Aurelius Augustine, Bishop of Hippo: A New Translation, Vol. IX – On Christian Doctrine; The Enchiridion; On Catechising; and On Faith and the Creed (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1892), 76.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: best suv | Thanks to trucks, infiniti suv and toyota suv