Peter Lumpkins recently wrote an article titled “The International Mission Board and Uninspired Missions Giving.” In this article, he laments that J.D. Greear and David Platt are the chosen spokesmen for the IMB Lottie Moon Christmas Offering promotional DVD. Here are the reasons he disagrees with Greear and Platt being the spokesmen:
1. Greear’s church (The Summit Church) doesn’t include anything about the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering on its website or in its half-finished Annual Church Profile report, which according to Lumpkins, only includes their number of baptisms.
2. Platt’s church (The Church at Brook Hills) hasn’t filled out an Annual Church Profile Report since 2007.
3. As best Peter can tell, Platt’s church gave to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering in 1996, and hasn’t given to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering since.
The saddest thing about Peter’s article is that instead of actually finding out from these churches if they give to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering or instead of hearing about their giving from the IMB, Peter assumes the worst, that neither Greear’s or Platt’s churches support the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering. Here’s some quotes from his article,
According to the church’s website, Greear’s church sponsors a yearly “Christmas Missions Offering,” the goal of which is 625K for 2011. A full 75% ($468,750) will go toward “Church Planting” and the remaining 25% ($156,250) will be used for “Local Outreach.” One will look in vain for any specific reference that monies raised will be given to The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering. But if Greear’s church does not participate in cooperative giving toward raising the $175,000,000 the International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention is pursuing, why is J.D. Greear a spokesman for the offering? Why would IMB allow him to be a catylst for inspiring others to give to a cause toward which Greear apparently has no loyalties? Let me be clear: I am not suggesting Dr. Greear lacks loyalities to global missions, church planting, and/or world evangelism.
To the contrary, when one looks at the many global projects in which The Summit Church is involved, one cannot go away concluding no interest exists inchurch planting. On the other hand, the question is not about whether passion forchurch planting exists but whether a passion for cooperative missions is present. In Greear’s case, then, him being chosen to be a poster boy for the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering remains entirely inexplicable.
Even so, the inexplicability of Greear’s presence as a promotional tool for the IMB is to be surpassed by David Platt’s presence on the video. Why? Since 2007, The Church at Brook Hills has apparently not filed an ACP report which means we do not know if the church either supports the cooperative program in any significant way or presently supports The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for international missions. And, if their record of past giving to Lottie Moon predicts present support, it is not unreasonable to assume that they are not now giving to international missions through The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering. As best I can tell, the last gift to Lottie Moon given by the Church at Brook Hills was 1996. They recorded $3,333 to the Christmas offering, a sum taken from total receipts of $3.7m. The same year, they posted $198,000 toward “non-SBC Mission Expenditures.” Hence, if David Platt serves as another inspirational catalyst for giving to The Lottie Moon Christmas Offering, one must wonder just how out of touch the International Mission Board is with grassroots Southern Baptists.
Yet, not only is Platt in the promotional DVD, IMB has also tapped into Platt as a keynote speaker for international missions.The International Missions Board is sponsoring a conference entitled “Missions Forum 2012 East” to be held February 20 – 22, 2012 at the First Baptist Church Trussville, AL. Along with IMB vice-president, Gordon Fort, David Platt is scheduled as a featured speaker. Once again, we have men lifted up as role models in areas where there is no apparent evidence they qualify for the job. Since no evidence appears to exist in reasonably accepted sources (i.e. ACP data) that Platt supports Southern Baptist cooperative missions, then the IMB seems obligated to explain to Southern Baptists why it publicizes and promotes him as a spokesman for Southern Baptist missionary causes.
Does anyone see the problem with Lumpkins’s assumptions? He has no proof that Greear’s or Platt’s churches do not give to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering, and yet, he assumes the worst. Just a quick google of Greear’s church, and one finds that The Summit church gave $192,400 to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering in 2010. Thus, Lumpkins’s negative assumption about Greear is dead wrong.
Not only does Peter assume the worst, but his supporters assume the worst as well. Listen to this comment by Ron Hale:
Peter,
We are living in a day, when it is very easy for Missions Leaders at IMB and NAMB to retrieve information on the top ten givers in various sizes of congregations … to the Lottie Moon Offering for International Missions and Annie Armstrong Offering for North American Missions.It seems only sensible and wise that we would use those who are currently setting the greatest examples of sacrifice as visible and vocal examples in giving to SBC causes.
In a local church setting, we would never use a member for a tithing testimony if they gave poorly to the local church but gave generously to other local charities.
You are wise for not calling into question their commitment to church planting and outreach around the world, but you are also courageous for calling into question their support (or lack thereof) to the Southern Baptist cause of the Lottie Moon Offering for International Missions. Through this proven method, our 5,000 plus missionaries will be blessed.
Although this story greatly saddens me, I must thank you for reporting on this issue!
Courageous? Really Ron? It’s courageous to speculate about fellow brothers in Christ, to assume the worst based on zero evidence? It blows my mind that Lumpkins’s supporters cannot see that his article is based on negative assumptions, speculation, and poor research. There’s no basis for his negative assumptions other than his own bias. He has no data to base his assumptions on. The closest data he has is that the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering is not mentioned on the Summit Church’s website and the Church at Brook Hills didn’t give to Lottie Moon in 2007, so he assumes that they do not give today either. It’s entirely speculation.
This is just another example of many examples where Lumpkins finds smoke where there’s no fire.
So, my challenge to Lumpkins and his supporters is this: If it’s proven that Greear’s church (already proven) and Platt’s church give to the Lottie Moon Christmas offering, will you publicly recant your statements against these men and the IMB? Will you also repent for sowing discord among your Southern Baptist brethren?
Do you think your negative statements about these men and the IMB encourage churches to give to the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering? How many Southern Baptists, like Ron Hale, actually believe your statements and your articles without researching for themselves?
Peter, if you’re such a huge supporter of the SBC, why are you throwing a negative light on the IMB during the month of its major offering? You’re not helping the SBC with your various conspiracy theories. To Peter’s supporters, you’re not helping the SBC either by encouraging him to assume the worst about his SBC brethren and SBC entities.
What are your thoughts?





.gif)