Pitfalls in Redemptive-Historical Preaching and Suggested Remedies

What is the message of the Bible? As you answer this question, here are some pitfalls to avoid and remedy so that you may preach the full counsel of God. More »

Download Lecrae’s New CD for Free

Lecrae's New CD Church Clothes is out, and you can download it for free! More »

Reformed Cast Interview about The Harry Potter Bible Study

Scott Oakland recently interviewed me about my book The Harry Potter Bible Study. More »

Adolf Hitler’s Thoughts About Romney coming to Liberty University

I thought this was funny. More »

My Thoughts on Mitt Romney Speaking at Liberty University’s Spring 2012 Graduation

Should Liberty invite Mormons to speak at their graduation(s)? I try to answer this question using Liberty's own words. More »

Ten Contemporary Sacred Cows that Need to be Tipped

It's time for some cow tipping! More »

Three Youtube Videos we use in Family Worship

Share My wife and I have two children; one is four years of age and the other is about to turn three. Here are three videos from youtube that we use during More »

What’s Wrong With the Church?

Some issues that need to be answered by local churches. More »

Category Archives: Sermons

Incredible Videos of Dallas Tornado Treating Tractor Trailers Like Toys

This is raw footage of a tornado that hit Dallas, TX on April 3, 2012.

Incoming search terms for the article:

From a Former “Jesus Freak”: An Open Letter to Lecrae, Tedashii, Flame, and Trip Lee

Share

Let me begin by saying that I’m a huge fan of all of you.  I listen to you frequently.  I want to encourage you to keep doing what you’re doing, but I also want to encourage you to downplay your “coolness.”  You appeal to a certain niche in contemporary society.  If you tweet something, it’s posted all over the Internet.  All of you are cool.  I’m a balding, pudgy white boy who is stuck in the 90’s.  I’m the exact opposite of you.  You and I, however, preach a message that transcends all the wrong reasons people may listen to us.  We must reinforce this message continually by downplaying ourselves and our artistic expression.

John Piper at the Desiring God website answered this question in 2009 (audio and transcription here):

What are your thoughts on drama, movie clips, and the like in a church service?

I'll start with the freedom that we have in Christ, and then I'll move to the position that I operate in.

The New Testament isn't explicit on forbidding using a screen to put the lyrics up, or to put the scene of a waterfall behind it, or to make the waterfall actually move behind it, or to show a picture of your fishing trip to illustrate the big fish that you caught and how your people should now go out and be "fishers of men." The Bible doesn't forbid it.

I'll be gone in a few years and you can do whatever you want to do, but I believe profoundly in the power and the till-Jesus-comes-validity of preaching. And by that I mean the spirit-anointed exposition of the Scripture through clear explanations and applications of what's there. There's something God-appointed about that.

I think the use of video and drama largely is a token of unbelief in the power of preaching. And I think that, to the degree that pastors begin to supplement their preaching with this entertaining spice to help people stay with them and be moved and get helped, it's going to backfire. It's going to backfire.

It's going to communicate that preaching is weak, preaching doesn't save, preaching doesn't hold, but entertainment does. And we'll just go further and further. So we don't do video clips during the sermon. We don't do skits.

I went to a drama at our church four days ago. I believe in drama. I believe in the power of drama. But let drama be drama! And let preaching be preaching! Let's have the arts in our churches, but don't try to squash it all into Sunday morning. So I get worked up about these things.

That's where I am on that. Free. Nobody is going to go to hell because of this, in the short run.

When I was in high school, there were many of us who identified ourselves as “Jesus Freaks.”  DC Talk had a huge influence on many of the professed Christians in my high school.  Most of the popular “cool” kids in my school were “Jesus Freaks.”  Today, 12 years later, a very small percentage of these former “Jesus Freaks” are still involved in the local church.  Unfortunately, many of these self-identified “Jesus Freaks” never repented of their sins and placed their faith and trust in Jesus.  They were “Jesus Freaks” without trusting in Jesus.  This reality should terrify all of us who preach, especially those who rely heavily on the arts to communicate the gospel.

When we preach with much artistic expression, we risk feeding our hearers’ sinful, idolatrous desire to be entertained.  Since each of you preach through the art of rhythm and rhyme with music (rap), you run the risk of people accepting you while rejecting the Jesus you preach.  In other words, when we use the arts to communicate the gospel, we risk losing the gospel.  This danger is unfortunate, but is unavoidable.  You and I, however, can diminish the danger by downplaying ourselves and our faddish art, and by exalting Christ.  Since you’re not in a pulpit or rapping during corporate worship, you have more freedom, but the danger is still the same.

If we believe the gospel transcends the arts, coolness, and various fads (which we do), then we need to doubly make sure the gospel is the emphasis of our ministries.  Since each of you carry out your craft with such excellence, you are in danger of winning a whole generation to yourself and your “fad.”  You may have your own version of unrepentant “Jesus Freaks.”

How do we downplay ourselves, our fad, and exalt Christ?  In order to answer this question, we must realize four things . . .

First, every communicator in Scripture used the arts.

One cannot deny that Jesus used the arts in His preaching and teaching.  He often taught through the use of stories and contemporary illustrations.  The Scripture writers also used numerous contemporary writing styles and genres to convey the transcending truths of God.  Even the overall metanarrative of Scripture has been referred to as “the greatest story ever told.”  The metanarrative is God’s grand artistic expression of redemption history.

Second, every human longs to be involved in God’s common grace, but their sin distorts this “God-shaped hole.”

God created all humans in His image so that we may mirror Him and spread His image throughout the earth (Gen. 1:26-29).  As a result, we all have a natural desire to create.  Thus, not only do all humans desire to create through the arts (common grace), they also appreciate the beauty (common grace) displayed by others who create excellently through the arts.  The problem is that all humans are sinners (Gen. 3; Rom. 3:23).  This means our natural inclination is to worship the gift instead of the Giver (Rom. 3:10-18).  We naturally enjoy seeing and hearing excellent artistic expression, whether it be from the pulpit or the radio, but we often praise the individual without thinking of our Creator.  Only the work of the Spirit in regenerating our sinful hearts will redeem us from this idolatrous, god-less view of artistic expression, and help us to recognize God's handiwork when we see it (common grace: 1 Cor. 10:31; Col. 3:17, 23; 1 Pet. 4:11).

Third, every person who shares the gospel uses the arts in some form or fashion to express his or her message.

The conundrum in this whole ordeal is that you and I must use some form of the arts to communicate the gospel.  Even John Piper uses the arts to communicate the gospel in some form or fashion.  His books are laced with artistic expression, as are his sermons (although less than his books).  Even the man who thinks he doesn’t use the arts when preaching, nevertheless, uses the arts (he probably just uses them in a poor fashion).  Homiletics is called “the art of preaching” for a reason.  As soon as a person tries to communicate something, the arts are used in this expression.

Fourth, the message must be the emphasis.

We exalt Christ through emphasizing the message.  The arts serve the message, the message does not serve the arts.  You and I must practice discernment.  We must examine our hearers to see if their unrepentance can be laid at our feet.  Some of this unrepentance is unavoidable regardless how much we emphasize the message or exalt Christ.  Even Jesus had people who followed His ministry for the wrong reasons.  What you and I must discern is whether or not we're doing everything we can to exalt Christ as we share the gospel through artistic expression.  We must examine our ministries daily to make sure we’re still in the ministry of the gospel for the God-glorifying reason: to exalt Christ, not to exalt ourselves or our artistic expression.

In conclusion, I haven’t told you anything you don’t already know.  I hope this article serves as a reminder to all Christians that when our hearers  accept us or our artistic craft, regardless how we communicate, this does not necessarily mean they accept our Jesus.  We must realize that using the arts to communicate the gospel is unavoidable; however, we do have control over the emphasis of our artistic expression.  Is our goal excellent artistic expression, or is our goal to express the gospel excellently through excellent artistic expression?  The answer will be displayed in our artistic expression, regardless what we claim otherwise.  Therefore, let you and I, afresh and anew, examine our ministries to see whether we're exalting Christ through excellent artistic expression or if we're hiding Christ behind our excellent exaltation of ourselves or our excellent exaltation of the arts.

Continue on for God’s glory alone friends.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jared Moore

A former “Jesus Freak"

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share

Christian Evangelism: Hiding in a Locked Room for Fear of Men?

Share

In John 20, following the death of Christ, a group of women went to Christ’s tomb on Sunday morning, only to find that His body was not there. Mary Magdalene ran to the disciples and many of them dismissed her claim, but Peter and John ran to the tomb. When they saw that Jesus’s body was gone, they believed, but did not fully understand that He had risen from the dead. The disciples then returned home (John 20:1-18). Now, we come to John 20:19-23, and we find the disciples gathered together in a locked room because they were afraid of the Jews. Their Savior, their Leader, was crucified just a few days earlier; therefore, they assumed the Jews would seek their lives next.

19 On the evening of that day, the first day of the week, the doors being locked where the disciples were for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.” 20 When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord.

Jesus, who is able to conquer sin and death, brings peace to His people. The disciples were glad they saw the Lord! They were extremely happy. Christians must be reminded constantly that they serve this same resurrected Savior. This reality should bring them peace even though they live in an evil world.

What’s interesting is that these disciples were about to experience severe persecution, from this point on throughout the rest their lives, because they served the risen Christ. Yet, Christ brought peace to them. The peace that Christ speaks of is not a safety that the world knows. The resurrected Christ gives peace due to His identity as the Conqueror of the Fall, the curse, and death. Money, politicians, family, guns, nuclear weapons, etc. cannot bring true peace. Only the Prince of Peace brings true peace to those who repent and place their faith and trust in Him. His peace transcends this evil world. Having been sent by His Father, He saves us from the wrath of His Father, sin, sinners, and Satan. This Jesus is the same Redeemer who was prophesied of in Gen. 3:15 as the Crusher of the Serpent’s head. He is the same Christ who is the Seed of Abraham, the true David, the One who is wiser than Solomon, the fulfillment of Old Testament prophesy, etc. He created all things and holds all things together (Col. 1:16-17). This is God the Son Incarnate, resurrected to live forevermore. He is our Redeemer.

The question is, “Do we evangelize like we’re locked in a room for fear of men? Or, do we evangelize with the peace provided by our resurrected Savior and God?”

21 Jesus said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I am sending you.” 22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23  If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld.”

Peace comes through Christ. Just as God the Father sent God the Son to earth to save sinners, Christ now sends those sinners saved by grace to reach others with the good news of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection. As Christians, we are “sent out” to reach others.  Notice that these disciples are in hiding for fear of the Jews. Jesus, however, tells them to be at peace, for He was sending them out to reach others. Then, He told them to receive the Holy Spirit. This is a reference to something that would happen fully at Pentecost, not long after this appearance.

Jesus, then told His disciples that in light of receiving the Holy Spirit, they would be able to forgive the sins of others. Now, the reality is that only God can forgive sins. This is not a reference to Jesus’s disciples having the power to forgive sins like Catholic priests or the Pope, but it’s a reference to the fact that those who heard these men preach the gospel would be forgiven or condemned based on their preaching. In other words, through sharing Christ with others, we are involved in the salvation of sinners, their forgiveness, but we are also involved in the judgment of sinners when they reject the gospel.

Why do I think this is what Christ means? The answer is because the disciples never forgave anyone’s sins in the rest of the New Testament. They instead preached the gospel and baptized those who repented and placed their trust in Christ.

20 Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God (2 Cor. 5:20)

How must we respond to the truth presented in John 20:19-23?  The same resurrected Christ who brought peace to His disciples in the midst of severe persecution, continues to provide peace in the midst of this evil world for those who trust in Him. What Christians must ask is, “Do we evangelize like Christ rose from the dead,” or, “Have we have locked ourselves in a room for fear of men?” The sin of silence plagues evangelical churches without a shred of accountability. I fear most Christians do not evangelize with the peace provided by the resurrected Savior. Almost every excuse levied by silent Christians has fear as its foundation. There are numerous excuses for the sin of silence that serve as examples: “What if they get angry?” “What if I offend them?” “What if say no?” “I don’t want to push them further from God.” ”I’m inadequate.” “I don’t know what to say.” “What if they ask a question I can’t answer?”

Furthermore, concerning more specific application, I don’t recommend adding quotas to ministry. I think quotas either serve to discourage us or they encourage us to boast in our accomplishments. For example, I don’t like putting more strain on myself than Scripture by saying, “I will baptize one per week this year.” Now, a healthy goal would be to intentionally pursue the individuals God has already placed in your life and to seek others. We need to evangelize with the peace of the resurrected Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit, in obedience to Him, without fear. That seems to be the emphasis of this passage, not some western revivalistic quota. You let God sort out the souls. Your job is to take the gospel to your neighbors, worldwide. Just as God the Father sent God the Son, God the Son now sends us. Until every person on earth repents and places their trust in Christ, we have not reached God’s quota (I still affirm predestination, but the will of God is complex. He is not willing that any should perish; nevertheless, only His people will surely be saved). In response to the redemption provided by Christ, in thankfulness let us seek the world with His gospel. We are not alone as we carry out the task of evangelism. The Triune God is with us, even indwelling us through God the Holy Spirit.

In conclusion, do you evangelize with the peace of the resurrected Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit? Or, do you functionally deny the resurrected Christ and God the Holy Spirit by “locking yourself in a room” for fear of men, embracing the sin of silence?

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share

What are Postmoderns Looking for and How do we Reach Them?

Share

What are postmoderns looking for?

The simple answer is that Postmoderns are looking for authentic Christianity. They are not asking of Christianity, “Is this true,” but are instead asking, “Do Christians believe this is true, and should I believe as well?” The answer for them is found in the authenticity of other professed Christians (their “stories”) and their own subjective authentic experience (their own “stories”). In other words, in order to reach postmoderns, Christians must realize that their Christianity should be expressed not suppressed. Here is song called “All Around Me” by the band Flyleaf. It basically summarizes the postmodern Christian mindset. Notice how truth is primarily reduced to feeling and experience.

Unfortunately, when feeling, emotion, and experience are the primary emphases concerning whether or not an idea is worthy of belief, those who lack these postmodern qualifiers at the level defined as “authentic” by the postmodern, will be deemed inauthentic or fake. In other words, to the postmodern, your Christianity is only as real as your “authentic” expression of it. If you don’t express your Christianity according to their definition of “authentic,” you’re inauthentic, and thus, your beliefs are unworthy of belief.

So, if we want to reach postmoderns with the gospel of Christ, we must not merely believe, but we must also express our Christianity. We must not be cowards in worship or in daily life, for we must be “authentic” to the point of our Christianity being tangible and able to be experienced by others. Our Christianity must impact the sense experience of others. In other words, others should be able to “feel” our Christianity.

This does not mean that you and I should be fake, or that we should cease to preach or teach truth. It simply means that you and I should seek to be real Christians on a daily basis in all that we do. We are not merely Christians during worship or Bible study, but we are Christians every second of every day. We must put hands and feet on what we profess to believe. The true postmodern will indeed read you before they read the Bible.

Furthermore, I don’t know about you, but when an unbeliever tells me that the reason he or she is an unbeliever is because of an inauthentic Christian, I tell him or her, “What does that have to do with Christ?” What you and I must understand is that to the postmodern, our authenticity has everything to do with Christ. Prior to belief in His claims, these postmoderns have never experienced Christ, but they have experienced those who claim to have experienced Him. Thus, they judge Him based on their perception of our authenticity.

Finally, since postmoderns start with the wrong question, “Do Christ-followers believe the claims of Christ?” it means a simple gospel presentation will often prove fruitless. *Please understand, I’m not questioning the power of the gospel. I’m simply communicating the reality that postmoderns do not have the framework to accept the gospel apart from witnessing the authenticity of those who profess to believe it and share it  (God, of course, can save anyone at any moment). This is larely why door-knocking is so ineffective today. Postmoderns may open the door, let you into their home, and allow you to share the gospel with them, but they cannot determine if you are authentic or not in a mere 30 minute conversation. It will take much longer and many more conversations for them to “discern” your authenticity, and thus, “discern” whether or not they too should believe what you believe.

Like it or not, postmodernism is the air we breathe. Regardless where you live in the United States, you are surrounded by postmoderns (you probably even see a postmodern in the mirror from time to time). At the very least, we need to rethink how we carry out evangelism in a postmodern world. Remember Jesus’s words, “By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35). Our love for one another reveals the authenticity of Christianity in a premodern world, a modern world, a postmodern world, and in the coming post-postmodern world. Authentic Christianity, tangible Christianity, transcends all epistemological assumptions.  Therefore, if you and I are to reach postmoderns with the gospel of Christ, our Christianity must be expressed not suppressed, able to be affect the sense experience of others, and we must love with a tangible Christ-like love that permeates all we think and do. In other words,  our Christianity must go beyond mere affiliation with a political party or submission to an arbitrary list of “do’s and don’ts” while we ignore other unrepentant sin.  

Unfortunately, postmoderns are looking for Christ in the tangible witness of His church, and they are often not finding Him.

How will we respond?

Share

What does the Koran Teach about Homosexuality in Paradise?

Share

Five Years ago, Michael Horton interviewed Sam Solomon on the White Horse Inn concerning the differences between Christianity and Islam.  Horton begins,

Sam Solomon is an expert in Shari’ah Law – that’s Islamic jurisprudence. He spent 15 years studying Shari’ah Law to become an Islamic jurist. Upon his conviction he was given 48 hours to leave the country and since then he has been in London where he is a consultant with parliament, as he has also been with our United States Congress, but more than that, he is a witness to Christ in the Muslim world.

In the second part of Horton’s interview, Solomon answers Horton’s questions concerning Islam’s version of heaven (paradise):

Mike: Sam, in Islam, how does a person make it to heaven and avoid hell?

Sam: Well, first of all, Mike, heaven and hell are Christian concepts in Christian/Judeo-Christian understandings. That’s just biblical vocabulary. It does not carry in Islam. Islamic understanding…To them, heaven is a very foreign concept. It is a paradise, not “heaven,” where they will have pleasure. In paradise, according to the Koran, there are rivers of alcohol, rivers of wine, rivers of milk -

Mike: — making up for not having it on earth?

Sam: Yes, because on earth you need to be sober. You need to pray five times a day. But in the drink in paradise, may be not intoxicating…there will be rivers of alcohol, rivers of pure water, rivers of milk, rivers of honey, and they will be flowing. Every kind of meat that a man can desire, freshly cooked, everything – fruit of every kind, and of course they will have virgins – absolutely beautiful virgins, and they will always remain virgins; they will always remain pure; and they are there to appease the faithful ones. And these are called hol, and these virgins are specially created for the faithful ones. Added to that, the Koran says, perpetually fresh, young boys – not exceeding the age of about 14 at maximum, who are there for the enjoyment of the faithful ones. Allah apparently understands an alternative lifestyle. So that is as far as how to “make it,” of course this is all Koranic. In fact, some people, even Muslims, would find it difficult to bear that. But a very famous author and famous preacher in Egypt – he was a graduate of Al-Azhar, the very best and ancient Islamic seminary in the world – he wrote a book on the issue of homosexuality in particularly the boys in paradise. That book was banned by the Egyptian government. He went to the supreme Islamic court, and at the court all the scholars gathered together to examine this book, and they said everything described in that book, in terms of paradise, and how, and what way they will have their sexual relationships, it is all valid as far as they were concerned. This is the highest Islamic authority; it is indisputable, and that is the final word from them.

Here are the verses from the Koran that mention the boys provided for the faithful ones in paradise:

Koran 52:24 - Youths as fair as hidden pearls will be set apart to wait upon them; they will be running to and fro to serve them.

Koran 56:17 - immortal youths shall go about them.

Koran 76:19 - There boys of everlasting youth shall go about attending them: when you see them, you would think that they are scattered pearls.

I was unable to find a current Muslim scholar who agreed with Solomon’s interpretation of these Koranic verses.  Since I only understand English, my resources are very limited.  Solomon did reference Sheik Abdel Hamid Kishk and his work presented in Thoughts of a Muslim and the Subject of Sex.  I was unable to find this book translated into English; however, I found a quote regarding Kishk’s teachings in a book written by Judith Miller.

Speaking of the assassination of her friend Farag Foda, Judith Miller, a Pulitzer Prize-winning American journalist, wrote,

About two weeks before his murder, he mocked what passed for intellectual discourse among Islamists by citing a recent sermon by Egypt’s most popular preacher, Abdel Hamid Kishk, a blind sheikh who constantly attacked both the government and its official religious establishment.  Kishk had been telling his audience that Muslims who entered paradise would enjoy eternal erections and the company of young boys draped in earrings and necklaces.  Some of the ulema, the religious scholars at al-Azhar University, the government’s seat of Islamic learning, had disagreed.  Yes, they said, men in paradise would have erections, but merely protracted, not perpetual.  Other experts disputed the possibility of pederasty in paradise.  ”Is this what concerns Muslims at the end of the 20th century?” Foda asked in a column in October magazine.  “The world around us is busy with the conquest of space, genetic engineering and the wonders of the computer,” while Muslim scholars, he wrote in “sadness and pain,” were worried about sex in paradise.  In a column published just before he was killed, Foda reported that the Tunisian government had videotaped militant Islamic leaders on their prayer rugs, unwilling to await paradise, making love to beautiful women here on earth.  Meanwhile, Egyptian militants in Assyut were ordering believers not to eat eggplants and squash because of their resemblance to sexual organs.  “The Groups of Darkness are obsessed with sex,” he wrote.

While Western and Arab analysts stressed the differences between militant Islamic groups in Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood, which ostensibly opposed violence, Farag Foda’s murder showed that such distinctions were often of little practical consequence in Egypt.  The Gama’a Islamiya, inspired by Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, had claimed credit for Foda’s murder.  But the allegedly moderate Muslim Brotherhood and even al-Azhar, the government-supported center of Islamic learning, did not condemn the killing.  In fact, Al-Azhar’s Nadwat al Ulema (Circle of Ulema), an informal group of sheikhs and Muslim scholars, had asked the government shortly before Foda was killed to prevent him from establishing his political group and had complained loudly about his writings.  They stopped short of declaring his essays and him blasphemous (Judith Miller, God has Ninety-Nine Names, (New York, NY: A Touchstone Book, 1997), 25-26).

I imagine that Islam, similar to Christianity, has various interpretations of various texts.  Nevertheless, it must be noted that some Muslim scholars, sanctioned by the government at al-Azhar University, approved of Kishk’s interpretation of the purpose of young boys provided by Allah in paradise.  One must admit that it’s interesting Foda was labeled as the “almost blasphemous” liberal Muslim in Egypt, not Sheik Abdel Hamid Kishk, who taught that homosexuality and pedophilia, although forbidden on earth (see Koran 7:80-84 and 26:165-166), are permitted in paradise according to the Koran.

I’ve provided the portion of the interview below where Solomon details Islamic paradise.  I’ve also provided links to the interview in its entirety.  The full interview is worthy of your time and attention if you’re hoping to understand Islam.  I’ve yet to find another interview or book that is more beneficial in comparing and contrasting Islam with Christianity than this one:

Michael Horton’s Interview with Sam Solomon: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, and Part 8.

What are your thoughts about Solomon’s statements?  Do you agree or disagree?  Why or why not?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: best suv | Thanks to trucks, infiniti suv and toyota suv