

Mitt Romney, the potential Republican Candidate for the 2012 Presidential Election, is scheduled to speak at the graduation of Liberty University on Saturday, May 12, 2012. Romney is an outspoken Mormon. Concerning this decision, Chancellor Jerry Falwell, Jr. Said,
We are delighted that Governor Romney will join us to celebrate Commencement with Liberty’s 2012 graduates. This will be a historic event for Liberty University reminiscent of the visits of Governor, and then presidential candidate, Ronald Reagan to Liberty’s campus in 1980 and of President George H.W. Bush who spoke at Liberty’s 1990 Commencement ceremony.
The difference, of course, between Reagan and Bush and Romney is that Reagan and Bush were both professed Christians, but Romney is a Mormon. The announcement comes as no surprise since Glen Beck, also an outspoken Mormon, spoke at the Liberty graduation in 2010. What should Christians think about Liberty's decision to invite Mormons to speak at their graduations? The answer is not cut and dry. Let's look at Liberty's own foundational documents.
First, their doctrinal statement begins,
We affirm our belief in one God, infinite Spirit, creator, and sustainer of all things, who exists eternally in three persons, God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. These three are one in essence but distinct in person and function.
Mormons do not affirm the Trinity. Thus, Romney does not agree with Liberty's doctrinal statement. He actually believes the opposite of it.
Second, Liberty's Statement of Mission and Purpose reads,
Maintaining the vision of the founder, Dr. Jerry Falwell, Liberty University develops Christ-centered men and women with the values, knowledge, and skills essential to impact the world.
Through its residential and online programs, the University educates men and women who will make important contributions to their workplaces and communities, follow their chosen vocations as callings to glorify God, and fulfill the Great Commission.
Liberty University will:
1. Emphasize excellence in teaching and learning.
2. Foster university-level competencies in communication, critical thinking, information literacy, and mathematics in all undergraduate programs.
3. Ensure competency in scholarship, research, and professional communication in all graduate programs.
4. Promote the synthesis of academic knowledge and Christian worldview in order that there might be a maturing of spiritual, intellectual, social and physical value-driven behavior.
5. Enable students to engage in a major field of study in career-focused disciplines built on a solid foundation in the liberal arts.
6. Promote an understanding of the Western tradition and the diverse elements of American cultural history, especially the importance of the individual in maintaining democratic and free market processes.
7. Contribute to a knowledge and understanding of other cultures and of international events.
8. Encourage a commitment to the Christian life, one of personal integrity, sensitivity to the needs of others, social responsibility and active communication of the Christian faith, and, as it is lived out, a life that leads people to Jesus Christ as the Lord of the universe and their own personal Savior.
Romney speaking at Liberty University's graduation fulfills points 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 (I'm being gracious here), but violates points 4 and 8. Also, since the Mormon god is non-Trinitarian, when Liberty speaks of "God" in its mission statement, they're necessarily speaking about a different God than Mitt Romney serves. Romney serves a god who doesn't exist.
Now, let's move to the 4th distinctive of the "Ten Liberty University Distinctives No Other University can Claim":
4. An uncompromising doctrinal statement, based upon an inerrant Bible, a Christian worldview beginning with belief in biblical Creationism, an eschatological belief in the pre-millennial, pre-tribulational coming of Christ for all of His Church, dedication to world evangelization, an absolute repudiation of “political correctness,” a strong commitment to political conservatism, total rejection of socialism, and firm support for America’s economic system of free enterprise.
Liberty University believes that asking Romney to speak at their graduation doesn't compromise their doctrinal statement. Falwell doesn't think the commencement speaker needs to be aligned theologically with the University:
The baccalaureate ceremony always includes a gospel message brought by someone who is in complete theological alignment with the university. Commencement, however, has always featured leaders from all walks of life and all faiths who share the university’s social values and traditional family values. Commencement speakers have included representatives from the following faiths: Roman Catholicism, Judaism, mainline Protestant denominations such as the Episcopal Church, and even some speakers with no religious affiliation at all.
Liberty believes they're "the finest [Christian University] for training champions for Christ." One would think, though, at a distinctly Christian University that believes it's set apart from other Christian Universities, they would at least invite a Christian to speak at their graduation. If only evangelical Christians are allowed to teach at Liberty University and their emphasis is on helping students gain and exercise a Christian worldview, then shouldn't this mission and purpose continue from the beginning of the student's education to the end of the student's education? If not, then why?
I wouldn't have a problem with Mitt Romney speaking at a political rally held on the Liberty University Campus, but I do have a problem with Liberty inviting Romney to speak at their graduation. Liberty's graduation should be where the doctrinal statement, purpose and mission, and distinctives of Liberty University come together to offer a final charge to students and parents concerning the essential nature of Christians living a Christ-centered life in an evil world. Instead, Liberty spends 4 years training students to possess and exercise a Christian worldview, only to abandon their own Christian worldview in the apex teaching moment, the final teaching moment for these students. This decision makes no sense to me.
To help clarify Liberty's reasoning for inviting Romney, Chancellor and President Jerry Falwell, Jr. emailed a letter to students. Near the end of the letter, Falwell makes this statement:
The ultimate purpose of having a prominent Commencement speaker is not to promote the speaker or his views but rather to inspire and challenge the graduates and showcase Liberty and its mission. My prayer is that having the presumptive Republican nominee as our speaker will cause many who have never heard of Liberty to take notice of what Liberty is doing to train a generation of Champions for Christ. Perhaps, many of them will consider a Christian education over the secular alternative.
I don't understand How an unbeliever can "help inspire and challenge" Liberty students? The purpose of the University is to prepare students to possess and apply a consistent Biblical worldview. How can Romney help do this if he's an unbeliever? Furthermore, How can an unbeliever "showcase Liberty and its mission" since their mission is the opposite of Romney's mission? How can an unbeliever help other unbelievers see that Liberty University is training "a generation of Champions for Christ?" The invitation for Romney to speak seems to communicate the opposite of Falwell's and Liberty's goals.
To summarize, as a graduate of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary (M.A.R. in Biblical Studies), which is part of Liberty University, I want to publicly say that I just don't understand Liberty's decision to invite unbelievers to speak at their graduation(s). If they hope to train up Christians who consistently possess and exercise a Biblical worldview, shouldn't they lead by example? The only argument I can understand is that they don't believe their graduation is a teaching moment, but I don't see how anyone can argue this convincingly.
What are your thoughts? Be kind.







.gif)