Pitfalls in Redemptive-Historical Preaching and Suggested Remedies

What is the message of the Bible? As you answer this question, here are some pitfalls to avoid and remedy so that you may preach the full counsel of God. More »

Download Lecrae’s New CD for Free

Lecrae's New CD Church Clothes is out, and you can download it for free! More »

Reformed Cast Interview about The Harry Potter Bible Study

Scott Oakland recently interviewed me about my book The Harry Potter Bible Study. More »

Adolf Hitler’s Thoughts About Romney coming to Liberty University

I thought this was funny. More »

My Thoughts on Mitt Romney Speaking at Liberty University’s Spring 2012 Graduation

Should Liberty invite Mormons to speak at their graduation(s)? I try to answer this question using Liberty's own words. More »

Ten Contemporary Sacred Cows that Need to be Tipped

It's time for some cow tipping! More »

Three Youtube Videos we use in Family Worship

Share My wife and I have two children; one is four years of age and the other is about to turn three. Here are three videos from youtube that we use during More »

What’s Wrong With the Church?

Some issues that need to be answered by local churches. More »

Tag Archives: god

5 Ways Pastors Hide God’s Glory

1.  When preaching for emphasis, we’ll make this observation, “Do you see where God repeated Himself?  It must be important then.”  Biblically, whether God said it once or one thousand times, it is still important.  By making this statement we imply that elements in Scripture that are mentioned fewer times carry less weight than doctrines that are mentioned numerous times.

2.  When we pray before we preach, or we pray for someone else that is about to speak, we will pray for an anointing.  Biblically, an anointing was for a king in the Old Testament or the saving work of the Spirit in the salvation of sinners in the New Testament.  What exactly are we praying for or hoping for in the pulpit?  The implications are blatantly unbiblical, for we are praying for an elevated state in the pulpit that is greater than the other Christians in the pews.  It is a “priestly” prayer.  1) The Scriptures need no extra-empowering, and 2) Having been saved and sanctified by God the Holy Spirit, we need no extra empowering.  By praying for an anointing we 1) deny the Spirit’s work in us, 2) compromise the priesthood of the believer, and 3) exalt ourselves to the position of “mediator of God’s revelation” in the pulpit.  We make ourselves popes in the pulpit when we pray such prayers.

3.  When we honor mothers, fathers, soldiers, or our nation during our worship services, we mingle the worship/honoring of our God with the honoring of graven images.  The first commandment clearly commands to make no graven images to use in worship.  We of course don’t carve them out, but we set these people and things next to God’s throne when we honor them during corporate worship.  Do it before or after worship!  Don’t mingle the worship of Yahweh with the honoring of humanity or nations!  The implication of such practice is that Christians can mingle the worship of Yahweh with anyone or anything.  We teach them to practice idolatry.

4. When we refuse to practice or encourage our churches to practice biblical discipline, we communicate that God’s discipline toward those whom He loves is not really love.  We also imply that “God is love” is not true.  We instead practice the world’s definition of love while preaching (hopefully!) God’s definition of love.  We also call into question the inerrancy of God’s Word as well as His wisdom.

5.  When we preach/teach only positive sermons, we communicate that God is incapable of moving through His unadulterated Word.  Not all of the Bible is positive.  We must preach the text in front of us.  In order to do this in a way that is faithful to the text, we must preach both positive and negative aspects of the text.  Is it not scary that as sinful as we are, we think we can “clean up” God’s Word so sinners will respond?  By trying to “clean up” God’s Word, we imply that 1) He needs cleaning up, 2) He cannot move through His written Word, 3) His plan for reaching the nations is not good enough, 4) The Bible is not inerrant, and 4) The Bible is not sufficient for salvation and sanctification.

What do you think about this list?  Do you agree or disagree?  Why or why not?

Incoming search terms for the article:

Is The “Sinner’s Prayer” Biblical?

Share

I’ll never forget when I was early in ministry and I tried to find the “sinner’s prayer” in the Bible.  I couldn’t find it!  So, at the very least, we know that the actual prayer that pastor’s encourage sinners to “repeat after them” is not in the Bible.  We also know that encouraging sinners to ”repeat a prayer after you” is not in the Bible either.  The whole push for “coming to an altar,” “making a decision for Christ,” “asking Jesus into your heart,” etc. are not in the Bible either.  However, this does not mean that the elements found in the sinner’s prayer are unbiblical: repentance, faith, the finished work of Christ, submission to God, etc.  The problem comes when pastors emphasize “making a decision for Christ” instead of encouraging sinners to decide today, and to continue deciding for the rest of their lives, constantly looking to Christ alone for their salvation and sanctification.  Their prayer, sincereity, decision, or faith does not save them; but, Christ alone does.  They therefore must constantly run to the cross from the beginning of their salvation to the end.

Paul Washer has declared war against the sinner’s prayer:

Do you agree with Paul Washer?  Why or why not? 

Do you encourage sinners to pray the sinner’s prayer?  Why or why not?

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share

Should You Get a Divorce From your Present Spouse(s) If You’ve Been Remarried Or Are A Polygamist?

Share

John Piper believes that all remarriages after divorce are prohibited by Scripture as long as both spouses are alive.  You can find a summary of his arguments here.  Although I do not fully agree with his arguments, I do mostly agree with the conclusions he offers for those that have been divorced and already remarried (I however believe that a Christian is free to marry if the divorce was due to his or her spouse’s adultery or abandonment):

Those who are already remarried:

1. Should acknowledge that the choice to remarry and the act of entering a second marriage was sin, and confess it as such and seek forgiveness.

2. Should not attempt to return to the first partner after entering a second union (see 8.2 below):

8. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 does not legislate grounds for divorce but teaches that the “one-flesh” relationship established by marriage is not obliterated by divorce or even by remarriage.

Deuteronomy 24:1-4: When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house, 2 and she leaves his house and goes and becomes another man’s wife, 3 and if the latter husband turns against her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife, 4 then her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her again to be his wife, since she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the LORD, and you shall not bring sin on the land which the LORD your God gives you as an inheritance.

8.2  The prohibition of a wife returning to her first husband even after her second husband dies (because it is an abomination) suggests very strongly that today no second marriage should be broken up in order to restore a first one (for Heth and Wenham’s explanation of this see Jesus and Divorce, page 110).

3.Should not separate and live as single people thinking that this would result in less sin because all their sexual relations are acts of adultery. The Bible does not give prescriptions for this particular case, but it does treat second marriages as having significant standing in God’s eyes. That is, there were promises made and there has been a union formed. It should not have been formed, but it was. It is not to be taken lightly. Promises are to be kept, and the union is to be sanctified to God. While not the ideal state, staying in a second marriage is God’s will for a couple and their ongoing relations should not be looked on as adulterous.

What do you think about Piper’s charge to Christians that have already been remarried after being divorced?  Do you agree or disagree?  Why or why not?

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share

Why is That Christian Dressed Up Like a Psychic?

Share

Deuteronomy 18:10-11: There shall not be found among you anyone who burns his son or his daughter as an offering, anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens, or a sorcerer or a charmer or a medium or a necromancer or one who inquires of the dead,

This is a pandemic problem in evangelical churches.  How many times have you heard someone say, “God told me,” “God lead me,” “God laid it on my heart,” etc?  One would think that these individuals heard the audible voice of God; but no, they base their statements on their feelings: a liver quiver, a gut assumption, butterflies, etc.  The problem is that there is nowhere in the Bible where God spoke to anyone through their feelings… not one example.  So, whenever these Christians make these statements, they have no authority or example in Scripture to prove that God is speaking to them.  They thus are playing the psychic.  Although they would never go to a psychic, they simply run to the mirror, assuming that they have some ability to hear God’s voice through their feelings.  These people would be against “looking into a crystal ball,” and yet, they have no problem “looking into how they feel” for various answers in life.  Just as a psychic assumes his or her feelings tell the truth, Christians that believe God speaks through their feelings, assume that their feelings tell the truth as well.  Thus, it is a sin to believe that God speaks through your feelings because you’re adding to the Bible; and it is a sin to claim that God is speaking to you when you have no authority to make such a claim.

In order to encourage these Christians to dress like Christians instead of like psychics, we must tell them that…

1. They have NO authority to claim that God speaks to them, if He has never spoken in that way in His inerrant Word. If you believe that God speaks through how you feel, the only argument you have is that you feel God speaks through how you feel.  This is an argument from silence, a logical fallacy; and since no one can feel your feelings, you have no accountability.  It’s extremely dangerous!

2. Since they do not know if God is speaking or not unless they hear an audible voice (and even then the Devil appears as an angel of light), they must trust in His already revealed Word. God shouldn’t have to repeat Himself for you to be obedient.

3. They are terribly inconsistent in what decisions they choose to wait on God to answer. No Christian prays about every single decision they make on earth, and they definitely don’t wait for God to speak to them before they make all the decisions they must make in a given day.  They instead only pray about what they deem are “big decisions.”  The problem is that if God has given you enough Scripture and wisdom to make “small” decisions, then He has given you enough revelation and wisdom to make big decisions as well.

4. By them waiting for God to give them more revelation, they speak negative volumes about the revelation He has already provided: His sufficient Word. Christians who believe that there is more revelation coming, often ignore the revelation that they have already been given: 1) the Great Commission, 2) using their spiritual gifts to edify their brothers and sisters, etc.  Furthermore, almost all cults were started by people who claimed God was speaking to them beyond the Bible.

5. The real reason you desire God to speak to you about the “big decisions” in your life is because you don’t want to face the consequences of making the wrong decisions? Don’t you desire to know the future more than you desire to trust God through the difficult times in life?  Are your motives not selfish?  Are you not willing to suffer for the glory of God?  If God always tells you the right decision to make, then why should you trust Him?

6. If you are honest with yourself, how many times in your Christian life have you been sure that God told you to do something, and it didn’t work out? Do you realize what you communicate about God whenever you claim that He told you something, and it doesn’t come to fruition?  You communicate that God is a liar!

7. If you are waiting on God to speak whenever He has not told you to wait, then you are a legalist. You must find in Scripture where God has told you, not only to pray, but also to wait on Him to audibly answer.  You won’t find the Scripture reference because you are adding to God’s Word.

8. Because you are adding to God’s Word, you are placing yourself in bondage. You are limiting your Christian freedom.  Biblically, if you are faced with a decision, and neither choice violates the Scriptures, your conscience, or is unwise, you are free in Christ to do whatever you want.  I realize that this doesn’t sound godly in contemporary evangelicalism, but it is biblical!

9. In every act in the Christian life, whether at salvation or in sanctification, God gets to the heart through the mind. Knowledge comes before feelings and emotions.  Whenever you are saved, you repent because you know that you have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.  Feelings of sorrow often accompany such knowledge; however, the knowledge comes first.  We must assume as well then that if God is going to speak to us beyond the Bible (which He doesn’t), that He’s going to get to our hearts through our heads.

10. If you respond to anything in worship without knowledge involved, you are merely responding to your emotions, not to God. It always worries me whenever a pastor says, “Since God is moving so much during the singing, I’m not going to preach today because I do not want to quench the Spirit.”  Where in the world does the Bible give a pastor authority not to preach the Word?  Also, how can the Word of God ever quench the Spirit?  Before the foundation of the world, God determined to move through His preached Word.  If the pastor is faithful to the text, it is impossible to quench the Spirit by preaching the Word!  So, what about all these people coming to the altar during the singing or the interpretive movement?  Well, either they were convicted by previous knowledge, or they were convicted by the truth in the lyrics of the songs, or they are merely responding to the warm and fuzzy feelings that are being produced in them by the interpretive movement they are seeing or the music they are hearing.  You know what really quenches the Spirit: people that respond to their emotions while ignoring the Word of God.  When you talk to someone at the altar, or after worship, and you ask them why they came up; and they say, “I don’t know, I just felt like I needed to.”  You’d better probe a little more, making sure that they are responding to knowledge, not to the bean burrito they ate before worship.

What are your thoughts about this issue?  Do you agree or disagree?  Why or why not?

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share

Teaching Hermeneutics

Share

I’ve taught hermeneutics a few times in churces; and here’s the basic outline of what I taught.  These are also the basic steps I go through every time I prepare a sermon.

Exegesis…

Historical Context

(Knowing the past in order to shed light on the full meaning of the Scripture)
(We can’t be Bible students without being historians)

1. Who are the recipients of this “book.” (Who was this Divinely inspired work of literature written to)?

2. Who wrote this “book.” (Who wrote this Divinely inspired work of literature?)?

3. What year was the “book” written (What year was this Divinely inspired work of literature written?)?

4. Where was the “book” written to (What place was this Divinely inspired work of literature written to?)? Briefly discuss the geography (the physical characteristics of the land).

5. What was happening around those that the “book” was sent to? Briefly describe each of these: Politically (Who, and what type of leader was in power?), Economically (Was the area poor or rich?), Religiously (What religions made up the area?), and anything else that you see as important.

6. What were some cultural norms according to the text given (With the text given, were there any differences culturally from their time to our time?)?

Literary Context

(We Must Interpret the Bible in the literary form the author wrote, for God inspired it in that form.)

1. Concerning genre, what type of literature is it (Legal (Exodus 20- Deuteronomy 33), Narrative (historical account), Poetry (the measured language of emotion), Proverb (A short saying instead of lots of words to get a point across), Parable (something placed alongside something else for the means of comparison), Epistle (letter), Prophecy (telling of future events), Apocalyptic (revelation of things that are hidden, particularly the end of times)?

2. What is the overall theme of the book (What is the overall reason the author wrote the book)?

3. Using the types of literature given above, what type of literature is the passage? What is the theme of this passage, and how does this theme relate to the overall theme of the book (How does the author’s single thought found in this passage relate to the overall purpose for writing the book?)

4. Identify the natural divisions of the text (determine where a paragraph ends and another begins).

5. Determine what the individual words mean.

a. Check at least three (preferably more) Bible Versions, one close to the literal category, one close to the interpretive category, and one in-between, to see if there are any differences in the texts (written verses). Recommended Bibles: NASB (New American Standard Bible), ESV (English Standard Version), NKJV (New King James Version), HCSB (Holman Christian Standard Bible), and lastly, the NIV (New International Version).

b. Now write down any differences you see between the texts: as far as different meaning of words.

c. If there were any differences in the meanings of the texts, then consult at least 2 Greek/Hebrew Dictionaries/ Commentaries.  *ALSO, check a modern English dictionary for the words in question may be synonyms (one of two or more words or expressions of the same language that have the same or nearly the same meaning in some or all senses).

d. After checking these versions, consult at least five conservative commentaries to see if there are any differences between them concerning the texts (written verses).

e. If there are any differences between the commentaries, then trace the development of the author’s theme to help you decide which commentary is right. Then cross-reference the Scripture to see if there are any parallel passages in the Bible. (Since all Scripture is inspired, we must weigh it against itself; Many of our difficulties in study will be worked out this way.) Recommended Cross-reference tool: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, Your Study Bible.

6. Put the results of your analysis into non-technical, easily understood words that clearly convey the author’s intended meaning. (Put it in “Pew Talk” form).

Key Word/ Figures of Speech/ Antecedent Theology/ Analogy of Faith

Key Words
1. Verse by verse, what are the main words that develop the theme? List them here.

Figures of Speech
(simile or metaphor) (simile- like or as- (example- you smell like a cow); metaphor- direct (example- you are a cow.))
1. Are there any words that are used in a figurative way that you need to further explain? If so, explain them here. (Use Greek/Heberew dictionaries and commentaries).

Antecedent Theology
1. Concerning the theme of the passage, are there any Old Testament examples that come to mind? If so, list them. Since all Scripture is united in being God’s inspired Holy Word, we need to use it to explain itself. There is no better illustration than Scripture, for it is authoritative.

2. What was on the author’s mind from the Old Testament or the New Testament (must be from Scripture previous to the passage being studied), if anything, when he wrote this passage (Does the author quote anything from the Old or New Testament? Does the author refer to anyone or anything from the Old or New Testament? If so, then study out what he’s quoting so you can fully understand what the author is saying.)

Analogy of Faith
1. How does this passage fit in with the rest of the Bible; how does it fit in with the overall plan of redemption? (From Genesis to Revelation God has mapped out His plan for the salvation of man. How does this passage of Scripture fit in with this plan?)

    Application…

 

Normative Behavior/Normative Principle/Normative Truths/Audience Analysis

Normative Behavior
1. Is there anything explicitly (Fully and clearly expressed; leaving nothing implied.) commanded? (If so, explain.)

Normative Principle
1. Is there anything that can be taken from the passage implicitly (capable of being understood from something else though unexpressed; It doesn’t come out and say it, but the principle is there. Does the author or main character set a Christ-like example that you can follow? If so, explain this example.)?

Normative Truths
1. Are there any truths that Christians should know? (Is there anything that doesn’t fit in with the Normative Behavior and Principle that we need to know. Is there anything that needs to be placed in our knowledge hard drive?)

Audience Analysis

1. Using the Normative Behaviors, Principles, and Truths from above, determine what areas of your life these truths need to be applied.

2. If you are going to be teaching or preaching this scripture, evaluate how the above truths can be applied to the persons’ lives that you’ll be teaching. (A teenager will need different application than that of an elderly person.)

Point of Contact

I. NAME THE TEXTUAL IDEA (What is the single thought?).
A. Find the Subject (1 word-most of the time).
B. Find the Complement (1 word-most of the time).
C. Turn the subject/complement into a working title.

II. WRITE THE TEXTUAL IDEA IN A SENTENCE. (What is the writer’s purpose for the passage? Past tense)

III. WRITE THE SERMON IDEA IN A SENTENCE. (How does this textual idea apply to us today? Present tense)

IV. WRITE THE INTERROGATIVE. (Turns the sermon idea into a question)
Asks Who, what, when, where, why, or how

V. WRITE THE TRANSITION SENTENCE. (Answers the interrogative, uses a number)

VI. WRITE THE DIVISION STATEMENTS. (Answers the interrogative and the transition)

Appropriate Response

1. What should be your appropriate response to the truths in this passage of Scripture? (What should you do now in order to properly apply and be obedient to what God has revealed to you in His Word today?)

2. What should be your audience’s appropriate response to the truths in this passage of Scripture? (What should they do now in order to properly apply and be obedient to what God has revealed to them today?)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: best suv | Thanks to trucks, infiniti suv and toyota suv